Just read a hilarious article in Wired called "Take Up Thy Tools". In it the author describes a past where everyone read Popular Mechanics and fixed everything themselves. He next describes the current world where because of our "broken educational system" no one knows how to do anything anymore. He explains that education has destroyed America's ability to compete, and if only people would build and fix things themselves like everyone did in the 40's and 50's our glory would be restored.
This is a really weak SF plot. Poorly conceived. I don't believe any of the world building.
What motivated this article? The author explained that he was rusty at soldering and had to practice what he learned back in school, and he was finger-pointing at the educational system saying it was their fault he hadn't done it in a long time. Why? Because they encouraged him to go to college! Teachers! How could you! If only this poor boy had been left to solder more he would have saved America.
The article asks "Ever wonder why Detroit isn't producing 100-mpg cars?" and goes on to blame it on CAD software, that modern engineers don't get their fingers dirty. Sorry. I live in Detroit. I've worked with car designers. The reason Detroit hasn't been making the cars of the future is because the guys that work in the industry DO get their hands dirty. They love their cars! Big, powerful, loud, fast combustion engine cars. I recall doing market research using golf carts to ask people if they would drive an electric car. This was during the same period that GM was secretly testing really nice electric cars in California, which they destroyed and buried as soon as California removed their zero-emission law. Living in an idealized past, as this Wired article does, the car designers stayed in love with the muscle cars of their youth instead of looking to the future.
So, anyway, if the described world of this article was real I'd have to tell my father and father-in-law that they magically now know how to fix their cars and appliances. I'd also have to explain to the high-school kid next door that he couldn't possibly be in his school robotics club because schools don't promote such things. Also, I'd have to stop fixing my own appliances and computers, or doing wood-working and art projects, because I wasn't specifically told by my teachers to do such. As I said, the world of the article is a bit out there.
The people that are going to change the world, who are going to invent new things, will do so out of personal drive and desire. They won't listen to those with conservative opinions, that warn against trying something new and possibly financially risky. The people that don't have enough of a drive to tinker, learn, explore, and spend their free time creating, won't. No need for finger-pointing, it's just a fact.
Now, I understand that the author was really just trying to sell people on MAKE magazine and was using an article in disguise to do so. It just seems that including an imaginary-evil conspiracy theory weakens the argument. Why learn to do things yourself? Because making things is cool. Why change the world for the better? Because you feel it's worth the time and money. No evil-teacher-empire necessary. Really.